Amazon Q Developer vs Cody
A side-by-side comparison of Amazon Q Developer and Cody — pricing, free tiers, and who each tool is genuinely best for.
| Tagline | AWS's AI coding assistant for building, transforming, and operating on AWS | Sourcegraph's AI assistant with whole-codebase context for big teams |
| Category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
| Pricing | Free tier; Pro from ~$19/user/mo | Free tier; Pro from ~$9/user/mo; Enterprise custom pricing |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | Teams building on AWS who want an assistant that understands their cloud services and can automate code transformations. | Enterprises with large, complex codebases that need an assistant grounded in whole-repository context. |
| Not for | Developers outside the AWS ecosystem who want a vendor-neutral, frontier-model-first experience. | Solo developers or small projects that don't need heavyweight codebase-wide search and context. |
| Use cases | AWS-aware code completion Java version upgrades Code transformation Infrastructure troubleshooting Agentic feature development | Codebase-wide Q&A Context-aware completion Large monorepo navigation Refactoring across files Code search with AI |
| Visit Amazon Q Developer | Visit Cody |
Amazon Q Developer
Choose it if: Teams building on AWS who want an assistant that understands their cloud services and can automate code transformations.
Cody
Choose it if: Enterprises with large, complex codebases that need an assistant grounded in whole-repository context.