Augment Code vs Continue
A side-by-side comparison of Augment Code and Continue — pricing, free tiers, and who each tool is genuinely best for.
| Tagline | AI coding agent built for large, complex codebases | Open-source AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains |
| Category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
| Pricing | Indie from ~$20/mo; Developer ~$50/mo; Business from ~$100/mo; Enterprise custom — verify at augmentcode.com | Free and open-source (self-hosted with your own API keys); hosted plans reportedly from ~$10/mo — check continue.dev |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | Engineers working in large monorepos or microservices who need AI that understands the whole codebase. | Developers who want a fully open-source, self-hosted AI assistant with control over which models and data leave their machine. |
| Not for | Solo developers on greenfield side projects who don't need deep codebase indexing. | Developers who prefer a fully managed, no-configuration coding assistant out of the box. |
| Use cases | Full-codebase contextual completion Multi-file agentic refactoring Architecture-aware generation Onboarding to large repos | Bring-your-own-model AI chat Inline autocomplete with local LLMs Codebase-aware Q&A Custom AI workflows |
| Visit Augment Code | Visit Continue |
Augment Code
Choose it if: Engineers working in large monorepos or microservices who need AI that understands the whole codebase.
Continue
Choose it if: Developers who want a fully open-source, self-hosted AI assistant with control over which models and data leave their machine.