Augment Code vs Cursor
A side-by-side comparison of Augment Code and Cursor — pricing, free tiers, and who each tool is genuinely best for.
| Tagline | AI coding agent built for large, complex codebases | The AI-first code editor built for working at the speed of thought |
| Category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
| Pricing | Indie from ~$20/mo; Developer ~$50/mo; Business from ~$100/mo; Enterprise custom — verify at augmentcode.com | Free Hobby tier; Pro ~$20/user/mo; Business ~$40/user/mo |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | Engineers working in large monorepos or microservices who need AI that understands the whole codebase. | Professional developers who want a full AI-native IDE with strong multi-file agentic editing and model choice. |
| Not for | Solo developers on greenfield side projects who don't need deep codebase indexing. | Developers unwilling to switch away from their current editor or who only need lightweight inline suggestions. |
| Use cases | Full-codebase contextual completion Multi-file agentic refactoring Architecture-aware generation Onboarding to large repos | Multi-file refactoring Codebase-wide chat Agentic feature building Predictive multi-line autocomplete Debugging with context |
| Visit Augment Code | Visit Cursor |
Augment Code
Choose it if: Engineers working in large monorepos or microservices who need AI that understands the whole codebase.
Cursor
Choose it if: Professional developers who want a full AI-native IDE with strong multi-file agentic editing and model choice.