Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
A side-by-side comparison of Cursor and GitHub Copilot — pricing, free tiers, and who each tool is genuinely best for.
| Tagline | The AI-first code editor built for working at the speed of thought | AI pair programmer that autocompletes code and chats inside your editor |
| Category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
| Pricing | Free Hobby tier; Pro ~$20/user/mo; Business ~$40/user/mo | Free tier with limited completions; Pro from ~$10/user/mo; Business ~$19/user/mo; Enterprise ~$39/user/mo |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | Professional developers who want a full AI-native IDE with strong multi-file agentic editing and model choice. | Developers and teams already living in GitHub and mainstream IDEs who want trusted inline completions plus chat. |
| Not for | Developers unwilling to switch away from their current editor or who only need lightweight inline suggestions. | Teams wanting a fully agentic, repo-rewriting IDE rather than an assistant layered onto their existing editor. |
| Use cases | Multi-file refactoring Codebase-wide chat Agentic feature building Predictive multi-line autocomplete Debugging with context | Inline code completion Code explanation and chat Writing unit tests Refactoring functions Generating boilerplate |
| Visit Cursor | Visit GitHub Copilot |
Cursor
Choose it if: Professional developers who want a full AI-native IDE with strong multi-file agentic editing and model choice.
GitHub Copilot
Choose it if: Developers and teams already living in GitHub and mainstream IDEs who want trusted inline completions plus chat.