Cursor vs Cody
A side-by-side comparison of Cursor and Cody — pricing, free tiers, and who each tool is genuinely best for.
| Tagline | The AI-first code editor built for working at the speed of thought | Sourcegraph's AI assistant with whole-codebase context for big teams |
| Category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
| Pricing | Free Hobby tier; Pro ~$20/user/mo; Business ~$40/user/mo | Free tier; Pro from ~$9/user/mo; Enterprise custom pricing |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | Professional developers who want a full AI-native IDE with strong multi-file agentic editing and model choice. | Enterprises with large, complex codebases that need an assistant grounded in whole-repository context. |
| Not for | Developers unwilling to switch away from their current editor or who only need lightweight inline suggestions. | Solo developers or small projects that don't need heavyweight codebase-wide search and context. |
| Use cases | Multi-file refactoring Codebase-wide chat Agentic feature building Predictive multi-line autocomplete Debugging with context | Codebase-wide Q&A Context-aware completion Large monorepo navigation Refactoring across files Code search with AI |
| Visit Cursor | Visit Cody |