GitHub Copilot vs Cody
A side-by-side comparison of GitHub Copilot and Cody — pricing, free tiers, and who each tool is genuinely best for.
| Tagline | AI pair programmer that autocompletes code and chats inside your editor | Sourcegraph's AI assistant with whole-codebase context for big teams |
| Category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
| Pricing | Free tier with limited completions; Pro from ~$10/user/mo; Business ~$19/user/mo; Enterprise ~$39/user/mo | Free tier; Pro from ~$9/user/mo; Enterprise custom pricing |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | Developers and teams already living in GitHub and mainstream IDEs who want trusted inline completions plus chat. | Enterprises with large, complex codebases that need an assistant grounded in whole-repository context. |
| Not for | Teams wanting a fully agentic, repo-rewriting IDE rather than an assistant layered onto their existing editor. | Solo developers or small projects that don't need heavyweight codebase-wide search and context. |
| Use cases | Inline code completion Code explanation and chat Writing unit tests Refactoring functions Generating boilerplate | Codebase-wide Q&A Context-aware completion Large monorepo navigation Refactoring across files Code search with AI |
| Visit GitHub Copilot | Visit Cody |
GitHub Copilot
Choose it if: Developers and teams already living in GitHub and mainstream IDEs who want trusted inline completions plus chat.
Cody
Choose it if: Enterprises with large, complex codebases that need an assistant grounded in whole-repository context.